Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs EPYC 7272

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7272
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
16.14
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
53.69
+233%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms EPYC 7272 by a whopping 233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7272 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking42327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.645.99
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency12.4917.81
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)14 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$625$5,500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7272 has 94% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7272 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads24128
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplier2927
L1 cache96 KB (per core)4 MB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)32 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size192 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors3,800 million38740 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7272 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketSP3sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7272 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7272 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7272 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB2 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/A-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7272 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7272 16.14
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 53.69
+233%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7272 25161
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 83697
+233%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.14 53.69
Recency 7 August 2019 14 July 2020
Physical cores 12 64
Threads 24 128
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 280 Watt

EPYC 7272 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, on the other hand, has a 232.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7272 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7272 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7272
EPYC 7272
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 21 vote

Rate EPYC 7272 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 825 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7272 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.