Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs EPYC 7262

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7262
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 155 Watt
13.08
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
16.77
+28.2%

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS outperforms EPYC 7262 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7262 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking571386
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.66no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency7.9956.68
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Hawk Point (2024)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$575no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7262 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache96 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm4 nm
Die size192 mm2178 mm2
Number of transistors3,800 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7262 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketSP3FP7
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7262 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7262 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7262 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7262 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7262 13.08
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS 16.77
+28.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7262 20779
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS 26644
+28.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.08 16.77
Recency 7 August 2019 16 April 2024
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a 28.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 453.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7262 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7262 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7262
EPYC 7262
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 vote

Rate EPYC 7262 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 11 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7262 or Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.