Celeron G6900E vs EPYC 7261

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7261 and Celeron G6900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking997not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency3.91no data
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date14 June 2018 (6 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7261 and Celeron G6900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °Cno data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7261 and Celeron G6900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketSP31700
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7261 and Celeron G6900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7261 and Celeron G6900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7261 and Celeron G6900E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7261 and Celeron G6900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7261 and Celeron G6900E.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2018 4 January 2022
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 46 Watt

EPYC 7261 has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron G6900E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 269.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7261 and Celeron G6900E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7261 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G6900E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7261 and Celeron G6900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7261
EPYC 7261
Intel Celeron G6900E
Celeron G6900E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7261 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate Celeron G6900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7261 or Celeron G6900E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.