3015e vs EPYC 7251

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7251
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 120 Watt
9.40
+450%

EPYC 7251 outperforms 3015e by a whopping 450% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7251 and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8052040
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.79no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency7.4126.97
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$574no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7251 and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.3 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache768 KB192 KB
L2 cache4 MB1 MB
L3 cache32 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors19200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7251 and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FT5
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7251 and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7251 and 3015e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7251 and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth153.652 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7251 and 3015e.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7251 9.40
+450%
3015e 1.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7251 14935
+451%
3015e 2712

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.40 1.71
Recency 20 June 2017 4 August 2020
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 4
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 6 Watt

EPYC 7251 has a 449.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

3015e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 1900% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7251 is our recommended choice as it beats the 3015e in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7251 is a server/workstation processor while 3015e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7251 and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7251
EPYC 7251
AMD 3015e
3015e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 121 vote

Rate EPYC 7251 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 29 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7251 or 3015e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.