Xeon E-2336 vs EPYC 7232P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7232P
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 120 Watt
11.16
+7.6%
Xeon E-2336
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.37

EPYC 7232P outperforms Xeon E-2336 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7232P and Xeon E-2336 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking703754
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.29no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency8.8015.10
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)8 September 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7232P and Xeon E-2336 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7232P and Xeon E-2336 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7232P and Xeon E-2336. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7232P and Xeon E-2336 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7232P and Xeon E-2336 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7232P and Xeon E-2336. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB128 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7232P and Xeon E-2336.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data44

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7232P 11.16
+7.6%
Xeon E-2336 10.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7232P 17731
+7.7%
Xeon E-2336 16467

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.16 10.37
Recency 7 August 2019 8 September 2021
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7232P has a 7.6% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E-2336, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 84.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7232P and Xeon E-2336.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7232P and Xeon E-2336, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7232P
EPYC 7232P
Intel Xeon E-2336
Xeon E-2336

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 125 votes

Rate EPYC 7232P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 44 votes

Rate Xeon E-2336 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7232P or Xeon E-2336, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.