EPYC 4464P vs EPYC 7232P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7232P
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 120 Watt
11.16
EPYC 4464P
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
30.54
+174%

EPYC 4464P outperforms EPYC 7232P by a whopping 174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7232P and EPYC 4464P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking703135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.2969.97
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency8.8027.51
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4464P has 580% better value for money than EPYC 7232P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7232P and EPYC 4464P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.4 GHz
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm5 nm
Die size192 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7232P and EPYC 4464P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7232P and EPYC 4464P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7232P and EPYC 4464P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7232P and EPYC 4464P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7232P and EPYC 4464P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7232P 11.16
EPYC 4464P 30.54
+174%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7232P 17731
EPYC 4464P 48518
+174%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.16 30.54
Recency 7 August 2019 21 May 2024
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 24
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 105 Watt

EPYC 4464P has a 173.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 4464P is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7232P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7232P and EPYC 4464P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7232P
EPYC 7232P
AMD EPYC 4464P
EPYC 4464P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 125 votes

Rate EPYC 7232P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate EPYC 4464P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7232P or EPYC 4464P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.