Ultra 7 265F vs EPYC 4584PX
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4584PX outperforms Core Ultra 7 265F by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 89 | 142 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 54.67 | 78.61 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 29.67 | 46.20 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (2023−2025) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 21 May 2024 (less than a year ago) | 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $379 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ultra 7 265F has 44% better value for money than EPYC 4584PX.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4584PX and Core Ultra 7 265F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 8 |
| Efficient-cores | no data | 12 |
| Threads | 32 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.7 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 30 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 2x 71 mm2 | 243 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 47 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 17,840 million | 17,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4584PX and Core Ultra 7 265F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | FCLGA1851 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4584PX and Core Ultra 7 265F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | - | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN |
Security technologies
EPYC 4584PX and Core Ultra 7 265F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4584PX and Core Ultra 7 265F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4584PX and Core Ultra 7 265F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5-6400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4584PX and Core Ultra 7 265F.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 28 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 37.24 | 31.41 |
| Recency | 21 May 2024 | 7 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 20 |
| Threads | 32 | 20 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 65 Watt |
EPYC 4584PX has a 18.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 60% more threads.
Ultra 7 265F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, 25% more physical cores, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 84.6% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 4584PX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 4584PX is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265F is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
