A6-9200 SoC vs EPYC 4564P
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 4564P and A6-9200 SoC processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 72 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 53.48 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 21.75 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (2023−2024) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 21 May 2024 (less than a year ago) | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4564P and A6-9200 SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.7 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 2x 71 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 47 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 13,140 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4564P and A6-9200 SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | FT4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4564P and A6-9200 SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4564P and A6-9200 SoC are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4564P and A6-9200 SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | Radeon R4 2CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4564P and A6-9200 SoC.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 28 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 May 2024 | 31 May 2016 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 10 Watt |
EPYC 4564P has an age advantage of 7 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
A6-9200 SoC, on the other hand, has 1600% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 4564P and A6-9200 SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 4564P is a server/workstation processor while A6-9200 SoC is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 4564P and A6-9200 SoC, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
