Xeon w7-3565X vs EPYC 4464P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 4464P
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
30.54
Xeon w7-3565X
2024
32 cores / 64 threads, 335 Watt
48.25
+58%

Xeon w7-3565X outperforms EPYC 4464P by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 4464P and Xeon w7-3565X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13536
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation69.9749.68
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency27.5313.63
Architecture codenameRaphael (2023−2024)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399$2,689

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4464P has 41% better value for money than Xeon w7-3565X.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 4464P and Xeon w7-3565X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads2464
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)82.5 MB
Chip lithography5 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size2x 71 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)61 °C79 °C
Number of transistors13,140 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 4464P and Xeon w7-3565X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt335 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4464P and Xeon w7-3565X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 4464P and Xeon w7-3565X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4464P and Xeon w7-3565X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4464P and Xeon w7-3565X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon GraphicsN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4464P and Xeon w7-3565X.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes28112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 4464P 30.54
Xeon w7-3565X 48.25
+58%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 4464P 48518
Xeon w7-3565X 76649
+58%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.54 48.25
Recency 21 May 2024 24 August 2024
Physical cores 12 32
Threads 24 64
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 335 Watt

EPYC 4464P has 219% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-3565X, on the other hand, has a 58% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

The Xeon w7-3565X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 4464P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 4464P and Xeon w7-3565X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 4464P
EPYC 4464P
Intel Xeon w7-3565X
Xeon w7-3565X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate EPYC 4464P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-3565X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 4464P or Xeon w7-3565X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.