Ryzen 7 9700X vs EPYC 4464P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 4464P
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
30.54
+30.8%
Ryzen 7 9700X
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
23.35

EPYC 4464P outperforms Ryzen 7 9700X by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 4464P and Ryzen 7 9700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking135222
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation69.9753.38
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency27.5133.98
Architecture codenameRaphael (2023−2024)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release date21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)8 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399$359

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4464P has 31% better value for money than Ryzen 7 9700X.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 4464P and Ryzen 7 9700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die size2x 71 mm270.6 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)61 °Cno data
Number of transistors13,140 million8,315 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 4464P and Ryzen 7 9700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5AM5
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4464P and Ryzen 7 9700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4464P and Ryzen 7 9700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4464P and Ryzen 7 9700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon GraphicsAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4464P and Ryzen 7 9700X.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes2824

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 4464P 30.54
+30.8%
Ryzen 7 9700X 23.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 4464P 48518
+30.8%
Ryzen 7 9700X 37084

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.54 23.35
Recency 21 May 2024 8 August 2024
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 4464P has a 30.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 7 9700X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 61.5% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 4464P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 9700X in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 4464P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 9700X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 4464P and Ryzen 7 9700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 4464P
EPYC 4464P
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
Ryzen 7 9700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate EPYC 4464P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 307 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 9700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 4464P or Ryzen 7 9700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.