VIA Nano U2250 vs E2-9010

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-9010 and VIA Nano U2250 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2714not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeVIA Nano
Power efficiency4.35no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Isaiah (2009)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-9010 and VIA Nano U2250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-9010 and VIA Nano U2250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4NanoBGA2
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9010 and VIA Nano U2250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9010 and VIA Nano U2250 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9010 and VIA Nano U2250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count2no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-9010 and VIA Nano U2250 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-9010 and VIA Nano U2250 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9010 and VIA Nano U2250.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-9010 1093
+511%
VIA Nano U2250 179

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E2-9010 1871
+111%
VIA Nano U2250 888

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

E2-9010 37.14
+368%
VIA Nano U2250 174

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 1 January 2009
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

E2-9010 has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E2-9010 and VIA Nano U2250. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9010 and VIA Nano U2250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9010
E2-9010
VIA Nano U2250
Nano U2250

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 29 votes

Rate E2-9010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 22 votes

Rate VIA Nano U2250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-9010 or VIA Nano U2250, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.