Pentium N3510 vs E2-9010

VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-9010
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.69
+25.5%
Pentium N3510
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 7 Watt
0.55

E2-9010 outperforms Pentium N3510 by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-9010 and Pentium N3510 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27282846
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Pentium
Power efficiency4.356.94
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 December 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$161

Detailed specifications

E2-9010 and Pentium N3510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
L1 cacheno data224 KB
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-9010 and Pentium N3510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9010 and Pentium N3510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

E2-9010 and Pentium N3510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9010 and Pentium N3510 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9010 and Pentium N3510. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866DDR3L-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels12

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
iGPU core count2no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-9010 and Pentium N3510 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-9010 and Pentium N3510 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9010 and Pentium N3510.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes84
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-9010 0.69
+25.5%
Pentium N3510 0.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-9010 1093
+24.5%
Pentium N3510 878

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E2-9010 1871
+79.9%
Pentium N3510 1040

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E2-9010 3268
Pentium N3510 3670
+12.3%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

E2-9010 37.14
Pentium N3510 30
+23.8%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

E2-9010 1
Pentium N3510 1
+31%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

E2-9010 91
Pentium N3510 123
+35.2%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

E2-9010 53
+60.6%
Pentium N3510 33

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

E2-9010 0.64
+68.4%
Pentium N3510 0.38

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 0.55
Recency 1 June 2016 1 December 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 7 Watt

E2-9010 has a 25.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

Pentium N3510, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The E2-9010 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium N3510 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9010 and Pentium N3510, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9010
E2-9010
Intel Pentium N3510
Pentium N3510

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 32 votes

Rate E2-9010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate Pentium N3510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-9010 or Pentium N3510, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.