Ryzen 7 7700 vs E2-9000

VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-9000
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.61
Ryzen 7 7700
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
21.88
+3487%

Ryzen 7 7700 outperforms E2-9000 by a whopping 3487% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-9000 and Ryzen 7 7700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2784238
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.67
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesBristol RidgeAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency5.7531.72
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$339

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E2-9000 and Ryzen 7 7700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cache1 MB8 MB
L3 cacheno data32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size124.5 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors1200 Million6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on E2-9000 and Ryzen 7 7700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAAM5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65W, (85W real world)

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9000 and Ryzen 7 7700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9000 and Ryzen 7 7700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9000 and Ryzen 7 7700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-5200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9000 and Ryzen 7 7700.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-9000 0.61
Ryzen 7 7700 21.88
+3487%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-9000 967
Ryzen 7 7700 34634
+3482%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E2-9000 1787
Ryzen 7 7700 8345
+367%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E2-9000 2897
Ryzen 7 7700 53881
+1760%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

E2-9000 1556
Ryzen 7 7700 18277
+1075%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

E2-9000 36.23
Ryzen 7 7700 2.72
+1232%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

E2-9000 1
Ryzen 7 7700 34
+3295%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

E2-9000 84
Ryzen 7 7700 3047
+3527%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

E2-9000 47
Ryzen 7 7700 308
+555%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

E2-9000 0.59
Ryzen 7 7700 3.64
+517%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

E2-9000 0.7
Ryzen 7 7700 15.9
+2139%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

E2-9000 6
Ryzen 7 7700 175
+2677%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

E2-9000 36
Ryzen 7 7700 368
+931%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

E2-9000 744
Ryzen 7 7700 14860
+1897%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 21.88
Integrated graphics card 1.03 4.42
Recency 1 June 2016 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

E2-9000 has 550% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 7700, on the other hand, has a 3486.9% higher aggregate performance score, 329.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that E2-9000 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 7700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9000 and Ryzen 7 7700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9000
E2-9000
AMD Ryzen 7 7700
Ryzen 7 7700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 311 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1395 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-9000 or Ryzen 7 7700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.