E2-3200 vs E2-9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-9000
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.63

Primary details

Comparing E2-9000 and E2-3200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26872694
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.30
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesBristol Ridgeno data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)7 September 2011 (12 years ago)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E2-9000 and E2-3200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size124.5 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on E2-9000 and E2-3200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAFM1
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9000 and E2-3200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9000 and E2-3200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9000 and E2-3200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)Radeon HD 6370D

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-9000 0.63
E2-3200 0.63

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E2-9000 979
+1.1%
E2-3200 968

E2-9000 outperforms E2-3200 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 7 September 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

E2-9000 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 550% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between E2-9000 and E2-3200.

Be aware that E2-9000 is a notebook processor while E2-3200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9000 and E2-3200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9000
E2-9000
AMD E2-3200
E2-3200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 304 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 21 vote

Rate E2-3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-9000 or E2-3200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.