Celeron N5095A vs E2-7110

VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-7110
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.44
Celeron N5095A
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.59
+79.9%

Celeron N5095A outperforms E2-7110 by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-7110 and Celeron N5095A processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21801722
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency9.0916.34
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)1 July 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-7110 and Celeron N5095A basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2.9 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB1.5 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors930 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-7110 and Celeron N5095A compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4BGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)12-15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-7110 and Celeron N5095A. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

E2-7110 and Celeron N5095A technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-7110 and Celeron N5095A are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-7110 and Celeron N5095A. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channels12

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-7110 and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by E2-7110 and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-7110 and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1212
OpenGLno data4.5
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-7110 and Celeron N5095A.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-7110 1.44
Celeron N5095A 2.59
+79.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-7110 2282
Celeron N5095A 4116
+80.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.44 2.59
Recency 7 May 2015 1 July 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

E2-7110 has 25% lower power consumption.

Celeron N5095A, on the other hand, has a 79.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron N5095A is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-7110 in performance tests.

Be aware that E2-7110 is a notebook processor while Celeron N5095A is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-7110 and Celeron N5095A, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-7110
E2-7110
Intel Celeron N5095A
Celeron N5095A

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 226 votes

Rate E2-7110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 99 votes

Rate Celeron N5095A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-7110 or Celeron N5095A, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.