Athlon II X4 641 vs E2-3800
Aggregate performance score
Athlon II X4 641 outperforms E2-3800 by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing E2-3800 and Athlon II X4 641 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2673 | 2162 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | AMD A-Series | no data |
Power efficiency | 4.56 | 1.38 |
Architecture codename | Kabini (2013−2014) | Llano (2011−2012) |
Release date | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) | 6 February 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E2-3800 and Athlon II X4 641 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 228 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 90 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 1,178 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E2-3800 and Athlon II X4 641 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FT3 | FM1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3800 and Athlon II X4 641. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | FMA4 | - |
AVX | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3800 and Athlon II X4 641 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3800 and Athlon II X4 641. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | DDR3 |
Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 8280 | no data |
Number of pipelines | 128 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of E2-3800 and Athlon II X4 641 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by E2-3800 and Athlon II X4 641 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3800 and Athlon II X4 641.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.75 | 1.51 |
Recency | 23 May 2013 | 6 February 2012 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
E2-3800 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.
Athlon II X4 641, on the other hand, has a 101.3% higher aggregate performance score.
The Athlon II X4 641 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-3800 in performance tests.
Be aware that E2-3800 is a notebook processor while Athlon II X4 641 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3800 and Athlon II X4 641, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.