Atom 330 vs E2-3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-3200
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.61
+165%
Atom 330
2008
2 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.23

E2-3200 outperforms Atom 330 by a whopping 165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-3200 and Atom 330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28003189
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency0.892.72
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Diamondville (2008−2009)
Release date7 September 2011 (13 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$43

Detailed specifications

E2-3200 and Atom 330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache128 KB (per core)112 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size228 mm251.9276 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data85 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million94 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on E2-3200 and Atom 330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM1PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3200 and Atom 330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

E2-3200 and Atom 330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3200 and Atom 330 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3200 and Atom 330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6370D-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-3200 0.61
+165%
Atom 330 0.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3200 968
+167%
Atom 330 363

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 0.23
Recency 7 September 2011 2 April 2008
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 8 Watt

E2-3200 has a 165.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom 330, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 712.5% lower power consumption.

The E2-3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom 330 in performance tests.

Note that E2-3200 is a desktop processor while Atom 330 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3200 and Atom 330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3200
E2-3200
Intel Atom 330
Atom 330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 23 votes

Rate E2-3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 65 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3200 or Atom 330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.