E-350 vs E2-3000M

VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-3000M
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
+55.6%

E2-3000M outperforms E-350 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-3000M and E-350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29853147
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.131.42
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date20 December 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3000M and E-350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size228 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000M and E-350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1FT1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000M and E-350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.1/2, 3DNow, Radeon HD 6380GMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000M and E-350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000M and E-350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6380GAMD Radeon HD 6310

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-3000M 0.42
+55.6%
E-350 0.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3000M 668
+58.3%
E-350 422

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E2-3000M 231
+118%
E-350 106

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E2-3000M 426
+134%
E-350 182

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E2-3000M 1597
+52.3%
E-350 1049

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E2-3000M 3014
+50.3%
E-350 2005

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 0.27
Integrated graphics card 0.52 0.32
Recency 20 December 2011 4 January 2011
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

E2-3000M has a 55.6% higher aggregate performance score, 62.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 months, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

E-350, on the other hand, has 94.4% lower power consumption.

The E2-3000M is our recommended choice as it beats the E-350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3000M and E-350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3000M
E2-3000M
AMD E-350
E-350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 54 votes

Rate E2-3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 396 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3000M or E-350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.