Celeron M 333 vs E2-1800

VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-1800 and Celeron M 333 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesCeleron M
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Banias (2003)
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-1800 and Celeron M 333 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz0.9 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography40 nm130 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-1800 and Celeron M 333 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT1 BGA 413-Ballno data
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-1800 and Celeron M 333. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-1800 and Celeron M 333 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-1800 and Celeron M 333. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7340no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 5 Watt

E2-1800 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 333, on the other hand, has 260% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between E2-1800 and Celeron M 333. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that E2-1800 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 333 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-1800 and Celeron M 333, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-1800
E2-1800
Intel Celeron M 333
Celeron M 333

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 166 votes

Rate E2-1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 333 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-1800 or Celeron M 333, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.