Core 2 Duo L7400 vs E1-6010

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-6010 and Core 2 Duo L7400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)no data
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)1 July 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-6010 and Core 2 Duo L7400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads2no data
Base clock speedno data1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.35 GHzno data
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L2 cache1024 KBno data
L3 cacheno data4 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1V

Compatibility

Information on E1-6010 and Core 2 Duo L7400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT3bPBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-6010 and Core 2 Duo L7400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

E1-6010 and Core 2 Duo L7400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-6010 and Core 2 Duo L7400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-6010 and Core 2 Duo L7400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-6010 and Core 2 Duo L7400 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-6010 and Core 2 Duo L7400 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-6010 and Core 2 Duo L7400.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-6010 534
+3.5%
Core 2 Duo L7400 516

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 April 2014 1 July 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 17 Watt

E1-6010 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 70% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between E1-6010 and Core 2 Duo L7400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-6010 and Core 2 Duo L7400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-6010
E1-6010
Intel Core 2 Duo L7400
Core 2 Duo L7400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 561 vote

Rate E1-6010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo L7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-6010 or Core 2 Duo L7400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.