Atom E3827 vs E1-6010

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E1-6010
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.34
+17.2%
Atom E3827
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 8 Watt
0.29

E1-6010 outperforms Atom E3827 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E1-6010 and Atom E3827 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30803124
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAtom
Power efficiency3.223.43
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Bay Trail-I (2013)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)8 October 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-6010 and Atom E3827 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.35 GHz1.75 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-6010 and Atom E3827 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3bIntel BGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-6010 and Atom E3827. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-6010 and Atom E3827 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-6010 and Atom E3827. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-6010 and Atom E3827 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-6010 and Atom E3827 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-6010 and Atom E3827.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E1-6010 0.34
+17.2%
Atom E3827 0.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-6010 534
+15.3%
Atom E3827 463

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 0.29
Recency 29 April 2014 8 October 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 8 Watt

E1-6010 has a 17.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 6 months.

Atom E3827, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The E1-6010 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom E3827 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-6010 and Atom E3827, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-6010
E1-6010
Intel Atom E3827
Atom E3827

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 562 votes

Rate E1-6010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 7 votes

Rate Atom E3827 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-6010 or Atom E3827, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.