Athlon XP 2400+ vs E1-6010
Primary details
Comparing E1-6010 and Athlon XP 2400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
| Architecture codename | Beema (2014) | Thorton (2001−2003) |
| Release date | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) | August 2002 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $90 |
Detailed specifications
E1-6010 and Athlon XP 2400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.35 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 80 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 63 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on E1-6010 and Athlon XP 2400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT3 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 68 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-6010 and Athlon XP 2400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | no data |
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-6010 and Athlon XP 2400+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-6010 and Athlon XP 2400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-6010 and Athlon XP 2400+.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 68 Watt |
E1-6010 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 580% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between E1-6010 and Athlon XP 2400+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that E1-6010 is a notebook processor while Athlon XP 2400+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E1-6010 and Athlon XP 2400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
