Celeron B730 vs E1-2500

VS

Aggregate performance score

E1-2500
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.37
Celeron B730
2012
1 core / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.37

Primary details

Comparing E1-2500 and Celeron B730 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30323040
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.321.00
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)1 July 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$70

Detailed specifications

E1-2500 and Celeron B730 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data18
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB1.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-2500 and Celeron B730 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFT3G2 (988B)
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-2500 and Celeron B730. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4+
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

E1-2500 and Celeron B730 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-2500 and Celeron B730 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-2500 and Celeron B730. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8240Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-2500 and Celeron B730 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-2500 and Celeron B730 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-2500 and Celeron B730.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E1-2500 0.37
Celeron B730 0.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-2500 593
+1.5%
Celeron B730 584

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 0.64 0.34
Recency 23 May 2013 1 July 2012
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

E1-2500 has 88.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 months, 100% more physical cores, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between E1-2500 and Celeron B730.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-2500 and Celeron B730, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-2500
E1-2500
Intel Celeron B730
Celeron B730

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 114 votes

Rate E1-2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 12 votes

Rate Celeron B730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-2500 or Celeron B730, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.