Celeron N2840 vs E1-1500

Place in the ranking	3152	3027
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	AMD E-Series	Intel Celeron
Power efficiency	1.31	5.00
Architecture codename	Zacate (2011−2013)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date	6 January 2013 (11 years ago)	22 May 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-1500 and Celeron N2840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	no data	2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.48 GHz	2.58 GHz
L1 cache	64K (per core)	56K (per core)
L2 cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	40 nm	22 nm
Die size	75 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	no data	100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	100 °C	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on E1-1500 and Celeron N2840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FT1 BGA 413-Ball	FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-1500 and Celeron N2840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V	no data
PowerNow	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-
Idle States	no data	+
Smart Connect	no data	+

Security technologies

E1-1500 and Celeron N2840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	no data	+
Secure Key	no data	+
Anti-Theft	no data	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-1500 and Celeron N2840 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	-
VT-d	no data	-
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-1500 and Celeron N2840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum memory size	no data	8 GB
Max memory channels	no data	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	21.32 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	AMD Radeon HD 7310	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video	-	+
Graphics max frequency	no data	792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-1500 and Celeron N2840 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-1500 and Celeron N2840.

PCIe version	no data	2.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	4
USB revision	no data	3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA ports	no data	2
Number of USB ports	no data	5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E1-1500 0.25

Celeron N2840 0.37
+48%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-1500 398

Celeron N2840 587
+47.5%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E1-1500 108

Celeron N2840 178
+64.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E1-1500 191

Celeron N2840 297
+55.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.25	0.37
Integrated graphics card	0.33	0.77
Recency	6 January 2013	22 May 2014
Chip lithography	40 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	7 Watt

Celeron N2840 has a 48% higher aggregate performance score, 133.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, a 81.8% more advanced lithography process, and 157.1% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N2840 is our recommended choice as it beats the E1-1500 in performance tests.

Note that E1-1500 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2840 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between E1-1500 and Celeron N2840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.