A10-4657M vs E1-1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E1-1200
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.24
A10-4657M
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.11
+363%

A10-4657M outperforms E1-1200 by a whopping 363% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E1-1200 and A10-4657M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31782411
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.263.00
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)1 April 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-1200 and A10-4657M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography40 nm32 nm
Die size75 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1303 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-1200 and A10-4657M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT1BGA
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-1200 and A10-4657M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-1200 and A10-4657M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-1200 and A10-4657M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7310AMD Radeon HD 7660G (497 - 686 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E1-1200 0.24
A10-4657M 1.11
+363%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-1200 380
A10-4657M 1759
+363%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.24 1.11
Integrated graphics card 0.33 1.24
Recency 6 June 2012 1 April 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 35 Watt

E1-1200 has 94.4% lower power consumption.

A10-4657M, on the other hand, has a 362.5% higher aggregate performance score, 275.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The A10-4657M is our recommended choice as it beats the E1-1200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-1200 and A10-4657M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-1200
E1-1200
AMD A10-4657M
A10-4657M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 293 votes

Rate E1-1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A10-4657M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-1200 or A10-4657M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.