E1-2200 vs E-450

VS

Aggregate performance score

E-450
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.48
+60%
E1-2200
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 9 Watt
0.30

E-450 outperforms E1-2200 by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E-450 and E1-2200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29103117
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
Power efficiency2.523.15
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date22 August 2011 (13 years ago)5 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E-450 and E1-2200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.65 GHz1.05 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography40 nm28 nm
Die size75 mm2107 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E-450 and E1-2200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFT3
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-450 and E1-2200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-450 and E1-2200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-450 and E1-2200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6320AMD Radeon HD 8210
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E-450 and E1-2200 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E-450 and E1-2200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-450 and E1-2200.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E-450 0.48
+60%
E1-2200 0.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-450 765
+61.4%
E1-2200 474

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.48 0.30
Integrated graphics card 0.38 0.49
Recency 22 August 2011 5 November 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 9 Watt

E-450 has a 60% higher aggregate performance score.

E1-2200, on the other hand, has 28.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The E-450 is our recommended choice as it beats the E1-2200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-450 and E1-2200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-450
E-450
AMD E1-2200
E1-2200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 541 vote

Rate E-450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate E1-2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-450 or E1-2200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.