i7-11700F vs E-350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E-350
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.26
Core i7-11700F
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
13.00
+4900%

Core i7-11700F outperforms E-350 by a whopping 4900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E-350 and Core i7-11700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3203601
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency1.3819.05
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E-350 and Core i7-11700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm14 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E-350 and Core i7-11700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and Core i7-11700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4AIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

E-350 and Core i7-11700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and Core i7-11700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and Core i7-11700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data50 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6310no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-350 and Core i7-11700F.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E-350 0.26
i7-11700F 13.00
+4900%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-350 425
i7-11700F 20855
+4807%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E-350 106
i7-11700F 2135
+1914%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E-350 182
i7-11700F 8709
+4685%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 13.00
Recency 4 January 2011 16 March 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 65 Watt

E-350 has 261.1% lower power consumption.

i7-11700F, on the other hand, has a 4900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-11700F is our recommended choice as it beats the E-350 in performance tests.

Be aware that E-350 is a notebook processor while Core i7-11700F is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-350
E-350
Intel Core i7-11700F
Core i7-11700F

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 428 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1011 votes

Rate Core i7-11700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E-350 and Core i7-11700F, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.