Ryzen Z1 vs E-300

VS

Aggregate performance score

E-300
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.21
Ryzen Z1
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
11.94
+5586%

Ryzen Z1 outperforms E-300 by a whopping 5586% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E-300 and Ryzen Z1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3207651
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesPhoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency1.1075.28
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release date22 August 2011 (13 years ago)May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

E-300 and Ryzen Z1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm4 nm
Die size75 mm2137 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E-300 and Ryzen Z1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1FP8
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-300 and Ryzen Z1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SVMno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-300 and Ryzen Z1 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-300 and Ryzen Z1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6310AMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-300 and Ryzen Z1.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E-300 0.21
Ryzen Z1 11.94
+5586%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-300 340
Ryzen Z1 18962
+5477%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E-300 88
Ryzen Z1 2252
+2459%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E-300 152
Ryzen Z1 8321
+5374%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 11.94
Integrated graphics card 0.32 8.29
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen Z1 has a 5585.7% higher aggregate performance score, 2490.6% faster integrated GPU, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 900% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Z1 is our recommended choice as it beats the E-300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-300 and Ryzen Z1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-300
E-300
AMD Ryzen Z1
Ryzen Z1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 303 votes

Rate E-300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 52 votes

Rate Ryzen Z1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-300 or Ryzen Z1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.