Phenom II X4 945 (95W) vs E-240
Primary details
Comparing E-240 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | Deneb (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 22 July 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E-240 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 258 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 758 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E-240 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-240 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-240 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-240 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-240 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W).
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2011 | 22 July 2009 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 95 Watt |
E-240 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 427.8% lower power consumption.
Phenom II X4 945 (95W), on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
We couldn't decide between E-240 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W). We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that E-240 is a notebook processor while Phenom II X4 945 (95W) is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E-240 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
