Ryzen Embedded V2516 vs Duron 900
Primary details
Comparing Duron 900 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 898 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Duron | AMD Ryzen Embedded |
| Power efficiency | no data | 51.69 |
| Architecture codename | K7 (2000−2004) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| Release date | 20 August 2001 (23 years ago) | 10 November 2020 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Duron 900 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.9 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 200 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 9 | 21 |
| L1 cache | no data | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 64 KB | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 105.68 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 25 Million | 9,800 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Duron 900 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Duron 900 and Ryzen Embedded V2516. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Duron 900 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Duron 900 and Ryzen Embedded V2516. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 68.269 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Duron 900 and Ryzen Embedded V2516.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 August 2001 | 10 November 2020 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded V2516 has an age advantage of 19 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Duron 900 and Ryzen Embedded V2516. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Duron 900 and Ryzen Embedded V2516, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
