Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Duron 750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Duron 750 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated523
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD DuronAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiencyno data47.34
Architecture codenameK7 (2000−2004)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date5 September 2000 (24 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Duron 750 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Boost clock speed0.75 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate200 MT/s54 MHz
Multiplier7.5no data
L2 cache64 KBno data
Chip lithography180 nm4 nm
Die size100 mm2no data
Number of transistors25 Millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Duron 750 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Socketno dataFP8
Power consumption (TDP)33.4 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Duron 750 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Duron 750 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2000 1 October 2024
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 180 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has an age advantage of 24 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, a 4400% more advanced lithography process, and 17.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Duron 750 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Duron 750 is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Duron 750 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Duron 750
Duron 750
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate Duron 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Duron 750 or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.