Xeon W-3335 vs m7-6Y75

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m7-6Y75
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.47
Xeon W-3335
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 250 Watt
24.74
+1583%

Xeon W-3335 outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by a whopping 1583% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m7-6Y75 and Xeon W-3335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2161199
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core m7no data
Power efficiency27.829.37
Architecture codenameSkylake-Y (2015)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$393no data

Detailed specifications

Core m7-6Y75 and Xeon W-3335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size98.57 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core m7-6Y75 and Xeon W-3335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1515FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Xeon W-3335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core m7-6Y75 and Xeon W-3335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Xeon W-3335 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Xeon W-3335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 515no data
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m7-6Y75 and Xeon W-3335 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Xeon W-3335 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Xeon W-3335 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m7-6Y75 and Xeon W-3335.

PCIe version3.04
PCI Express lanes1064

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m7-6Y75 1.47
Xeon W-3335 24.74
+1583%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m7-6Y75 2329
Xeon W-3335 39293
+1587%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.47 24.74
Recency 1 September 2015 29 July 2021
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 250 Watt

m7-6Y75 has 6150% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3335, on the other hand, has a 1583% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-3335 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m7-6Y75 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core m7-6Y75 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3335 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m7-6Y75 and Xeon W-3335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m7-6Y75
Core m7-6Y75
Intel Xeon W-3335
Xeon W-3335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 33 votes

Rate Core m7-6Y75 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon W-3335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m7-6Y75 or Xeon W-3335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.