Xeon W-3275 vs m3-8114Y
Primary details
Comparing Core m3-8114Y and Xeon W-3275 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 190 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 11.33 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon W |
| Power efficiency | no data | 11.90 |
| Architecture codename | Cannon Lake-Y (2018) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 5 May 2018 (6 years ago) | 3 June 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $4,449 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core m3-8114Y and Xeon W-3275 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 25 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 1.75 MB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 38.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 123 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 76 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core m3-8114Y and Xeon W-3275 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Intel BGA1440 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-8114Y and Xeon W-3275. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Core m3-8114Y and Xeon W-3275 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-8114Y and Xeon W-3275 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-8114Y and Xeon W-3275. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 140.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Iris Pro Plus | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-8114Y and Xeon W-3275.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 May 2018 | 3 June 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 28 |
| Threads | 4 | 56 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 205 Watt |
m3-8114Y has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 632.1% lower power consumption.
Xeon W-3275, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 1300% more physical cores and 1300% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Core m3-8114Y and Xeon W-3275. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core m3-8114Y is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3275 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-8114Y and Xeon W-3275, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
