Ryzen 3 3250U vs m3-8100Y

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m3-8100Y
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 5 Watt
1.80
Ryzen 3 3250U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.40
+33.3%

Ryzen 3 3250U outperforms Core m3-8100Y by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m3-8100Y and Ryzen 3 3250U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20061770
Place by popularitynot in top-10096
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore m3AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency34.0715.14
Architecture codenameAmber Lake-Y (2018−2021)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date30 August 2018 (6 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Detailed specifications

Core m3-8100Y and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache128 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core m3-8100Y and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1515FP5
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-8100Y and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core m3-8100Y and Ryzen 3 3250U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-8100Y and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-8100Y and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth33.3 GB/s38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 615AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m3-8100Y and Ryzen 3 3250U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m3-8100Y and Ryzen 3 3250U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m3-8100Y and Ryzen 3 3250U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-8100Y and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m3-8100Y 1.80
Ryzen 3 3250U 2.40
+33.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m3-8100Y 2864
Ryzen 3 3250U 3805
+32.9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

m3-8100Y 3850
Ryzen 3 3250U 4088
+6.2%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

m3-8100Y 6055
Ryzen 3 3250U 10251
+69.3%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

m3-8100Y 18.57
Ryzen 3 3250U 14.5
+28.1%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

m3-8100Y 180
Ryzen 3 3250U 353
+96.7%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

m3-8100Y 97
Ryzen 3 3250U 122
+25.9%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

m3-8100Y 1.7
Ryzen 3 3250U 1.9
+11.8%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

m3-8100Y 11
Ryzen 3 3250U 21
+88.4%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

m3-8100Y 58
Ryzen 3 3250U 101
+73.2%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

m3-8100Y 1646
Ryzen 3 3250U 1710
+3.9%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

m3-8100Y 1397
Ryzen 3 3250U 1662
+19%

Blender(-)

m3-8100Y 2206
+57.7%
Ryzen 3 3250U 1399

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

m3-8100Y 846
+2.6%
Ryzen 3 3250U 824

7-Zip Single

m3-8100Y 2983
Ryzen 3 3250U 3291
+10.3%

7-Zip

m3-8100Y 6246
Ryzen 3 3250U 9063
+45.1%

WebXPRT 3

m3-8100Y 136
Ryzen 3 3250U 140
+3.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.80 2.40
Integrated graphics card 1.98 2.98
Recency 30 August 2018 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 15 Watt

m3-8100Y has 200% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 3250U, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score, 50.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 3250U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m3-8100Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-8100Y and Ryzen 3 3250U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m3-8100Y
Core m3-8100Y
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 114 votes

Rate Core m3-8100Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2117 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m3-8100Y or Ryzen 3 3250U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.