i7-12650H vs m3-8100Y

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m3-8100Y
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 5 Watt
1.84
Core i7-12650H
2022
10 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
14.46
+686%

Core i7-12650H outperforms Core m3-8100Y by a whopping 686% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-12650H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2005508
Place by popularitynot in top-10086
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore m3Intel Alder Lake-P
Power efficiency34.1829.85
Architecture codenameAmber Lake-Y (2018−2021)Alder Lake-H (2022)
Release date30 August 2018 (6 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Detailed specifications

Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-12650H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data217 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-12650H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1515FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-12650H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-12650H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-12650H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-12650H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth33.3 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 615Intel® UHD Graphics for 12th Gen Intel® Processors
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHz1.4 GHz
Execution Unitsno data64

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-12650H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-12650H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hz4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-12650H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-12650H.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m3-8100Y 1.84
i7-12650H 14.46
+686%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m3-8100Y 2863
i7-12650H 22545
+687%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

m3-8100Y 3850
i7-12650H 8301
+116%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

m3-8100Y 6055
i7-12650H 34902
+476%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

m3-8100Y 18.57
i7-12650H 6.94
+168%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

m3-8100Y 180
i7-12650H 1852
+931%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

m3-8100Y 97
i7-12650H 250
+159%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

m3-8100Y 1.7
i7-12650H 8.9
+424%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

m3-8100Y 11
i7-12650H 89
+694%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

m3-8100Y 58
i7-12650H 263
+350%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

m3-8100Y 1646
i7-12650H 7732
+370%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

m3-8100Y 1397
i7-12650H 9784
+601%

Blender(-)

m3-8100Y 2206
+696%
i7-12650H 277

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

m3-8100Y 846
i7-12650H 1758
+108%

7-Zip Single

m3-8100Y 2983
i7-12650H 5703
+91.2%

7-Zip

m3-8100Y 6246
i7-12650H 47972
+668%

WebXPRT 3

m3-8100Y 136
i7-12650H 296
+118%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.84 14.46
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 4 16
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 45 Watt

m3-8100Y has 800% lower power consumption.

i7-12650H, on the other hand, has a 685.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 400% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Core i7-12650H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m3-8100Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-12650H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m3-8100Y
Core m3-8100Y
Intel Core i7-12650H
Core i7-12650H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 114 votes

Rate Core m3-8100Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1579 votes

Rate Core i7-12650H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m3-8100Y or Core i7-12650H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.