i7-10870H vs m3-8100Y

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m3-8100Y
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 5 Watt
1.80
Core i7-10870H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
9.07
+404%

Core i7-10870H outperforms Core m3-8100Y by a whopping 404% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-10870H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2006843
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore m3no data
Power efficiency34.0719.07
Architecture codenameAmber Lake-Y (2018−2021)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release date30 August 2018 (6 years ago)17 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Detailed specifications

Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-10870H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-10870H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1515FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-10870H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-10870H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-10870H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-10870H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth33.3 GB/s45.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 615Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHz1.2 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-10870H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-10870H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096 x 2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-10870H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-10870H.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m3-8100Y 1.80
i7-10870H 9.07
+404%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m3-8100Y 2864
i7-10870H 14400
+403%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

m3-8100Y 180
i7-10870H 1659
+824%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

m3-8100Y 97
i7-10870H 200
+107%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

m3-8100Y 1397
i7-10870H 7736
+454%

Blender(-)

m3-8100Y 2206
+655%
i7-10870H 292

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

m3-8100Y 846
i7-10870H 1283
+51.7%

7-Zip Single

m3-8100Y 2983
i7-10870H 5296
+77.6%

7-Zip

m3-8100Y 6246
i7-10870H 44976
+620%

WebXPRT 3

m3-8100Y 136
i7-10870H 225
+66.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.80 9.07
Integrated graphics card 1.98 5.58
Recency 30 August 2018 17 September 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 45 Watt

m3-8100Y has 800% lower power consumption.

i7-10870H, on the other hand, has a 403.9% higher aggregate performance score, 181.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Core i7-10870H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m3-8100Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-8100Y and Core i7-10870H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m3-8100Y
Core m3-8100Y
Intel Core i7-10870H
Core i7-10870H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 114 votes

Rate Core m3-8100Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 496 votes

Rate Core i7-10870H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m3-8100Y or Core i7-10870H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.