Atom C3958 vs Core m3-8100Y
Aggregate performance score
Atom C3958 outperforms m3-8100Y by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core m3-8100Y and Atom C3958 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1924 | 1633 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.54 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Core m3 | Intel Atom |
| Architecture codename | Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| Release date | 30 August 2018 (5 years ago) | 15 August 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | $449 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core m3-8100Y and Atom C3958 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 896 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 83 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core m3-8100Y and Atom C3958 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | BGA | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-8100Y and Atom C3958. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | no data |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core m3-8100Y and Atom C3958 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-8100Y and Atom C3958 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-8100Y and Atom C3958. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3L-1600 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 33.3 GB/s | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-8100Y and Atom C3958.
| PCI Express lanes | 10 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Atom C3958 outperforms Core m3-8100Y by 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Atom C3958 outperforms Core m3-8100Y by 49% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.86 | 2.77 |
| Recency | 30 August 2018 | 15 August 2017 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 31 Watt |
m3-8100Y has an age advantage of 1 year, and 520% lower power consumption.
Atom C3958, on the other hand, has a 48.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
The Atom C3958 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m3-8100Y in performance tests.
Be aware that Core m3-8100Y is a notebook processor while Atom C3958 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-8100Y and Atom C3958, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
