Celeron N3060 vs m3-7Y32

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i3-7020U Core i3-7100U Core i5-7200U Core i5-7300U Core i5-7360U Core i7-7Y75 Core i7-7500U Core i7-7600U Core m3-7Y30 Pentium 4415U Pentium Gold 4415U Pentium Gold 4415Y
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Celeron N2840 Celeron N3000 Celeron N3010 Celeron N3050 Celeron N3060 Celeron N3150 Celeron N3160 Celeron N3350 Celeron N3450 Celeron N4000 Celeron N4020 Celeron N4500

Contents

m3-7Y32 m3-7Y32
Celeron N3060 Celeron N3060

Primary details

Comparing Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N3060 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2036not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core m3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency36.17no data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Braswell (2015−2016)
Release date21 April 2017 (7 years ago)15 January 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$107

Detailed specifications

Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N3060 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.48 GHz
Bus typeOPIIDI
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N3060 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1515FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N3060. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N3060 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N3060 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N3060. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare		Intel HD Graphics 615Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
Max video memory16 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency900 MHz600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N3060 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N3060 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N3060 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12+
OpenGL4.5+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N3060.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes104
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m3-7Y32 2733
+312%
Celeron N3060 663

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

m3-7Y32 265
+266%
Celeron N3060 73

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

m3-7Y32 120
+216%
Celeron N3060 38

Pros & cons summary

Recency 21 April 2017 15 January 2016
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 6 Watt

m3-7Y32 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, and 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N3060. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N3060, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Core m3-7Y32
Core m3-7Y32
Intel Celeron N3060
Celeron N3060
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

m3-7Y32 Core m3 7Y32
vs
i5-5300U Core i5 5300U
Celeron N3060 Celeron N3060
vs
Phenom II X3 P860 Phenom II X3 P860
m3-7Y32 Core m3 7Y32
vs
A9-9425 A9 9425
Xeon X5647 Xeon X5647
vs
Athlon 600 Athlon 600
Xeon X5650 Xeon X5650
vs
Itanium 9760 Itanium 9760
Xeon X5677 Xeon X5677
vs
Apple M2 Max M2 Max
Xeon X5690 Xeon X5690
vs
i9-9900KF Core i9 9900KF
Xeon X5690 Xeon X5690
vs
N100 N100
m3-7Y32 Core m3 7Y32
vs
i5-1235U Core i5 1235U
i7-7740X Core i7 7740X
vs
i7-12700KF Core i7 12700KF
i7-7800X Core i7 7800X
vs
i7-4700MQ Core i7 4700MQ
i7-7800X Core i7 7800X
vs
i7-870S Core i7 870S
i7-7800X Core i7 7800X
vs
i7-8086K Core i7 8086K

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 22 votes

Rate Core m3-7Y32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 793 votes

Rate Celeron N3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m3-7Y32 or Celeron N3060, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.