Xeon E-2478 vs Core m3-7Y30
Primary details
Comparing Core m3-7Y30 and Xeon E-2478 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1978 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | Intel Core m3 | no data |
Architecture codename | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Raptor Lake-S |
Release date | 30 August 2016 (7 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core m3-7Y30 and Xeon E-2478 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 1 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz - 2600 MHz (1 core) | 5.2 GHz |
Bus support | 4 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 24 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | no data | 257 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core m3-7Y30 and Xeon E-2478 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | BGA | 1700 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Xeon E-2478. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core m3-7Y30 and Xeon E-2478 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Xeon E-2478 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | no data |
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Xeon E-2478. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 29.861 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 615 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Xeon E-2478.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 10 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 30 August 2016 | 14 December 2023 |
Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
Threads | 4 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 80 Watt |
m3-7Y30 has 1900% lower power consumption.
Xeon E-2478, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core m3-7Y30 and Xeon E-2478. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core m3-7Y30 is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2478 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-7Y30 and Xeon E-2478, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.