Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Core m3-7Y30
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms m3-7Y30 by a whopping 1008% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core m3-7Y30 and Ryzen 7 8845HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1995 | 304 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core m3 | no data |
Architecture codename | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) |
Release date | 30 August 2016 (7 years ago) | 6 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core m3-7Y30 and Ryzen 7 8845HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 16 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz - 2600 MHz (1 core) | 5.1 GHz |
Bus support | 4 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 512 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 8 MB |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 16 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core m3-7Y30 and Ryzen 7 8845HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | BGA | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Ryzen 7 8845HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | no data | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core m3-7Y30 and Ryzen 7 8845HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Ryzen 7 8845HS are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Ryzen 7 8845HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 29.861 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 615 | AMD Radeon 780M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Ryzen 7 8845HS.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 10 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Core m3-7Y30 by 1008% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Core m3-7Y30 by 1008% in Passmark.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Core m3-7Y30 by 84% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Core m3-7Y30 by 448% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Core m3-7Y30 outperforms Ryzen 7 8845HS by 280% in wPrime 32.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Core m3-7Y30 by 961% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Core m3-7Y30 by 922% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Core m3-7Y30 by 161% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Core m3-7Y30 by 165% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Core m3-7Y30 by 833% in TrueCrypt AES.
WinRAR 4.0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Core m3-7Y30 by 1415% in WinRAR 4.0.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.67 | 18.51 |
Integrated graphics card | 1.87 | 18.31 |
Recency | 30 August 2016 | 6 December 2023 |
Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
Threads | 4 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 45 Watt |
m3-7Y30 has 1025% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 8845HS, on the other hand, has a 1008.4% higher aggregate performance score, 879.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 7 8845HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m3-7Y30 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-7Y30 and Ryzen 7 8845HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.