Athlon X2 QL-60 vs m3-7Y30

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i3-7020U Core i3-7100U Core i5-7200U Core i5-7300U Core i5-7360U Core i7-7Y75 Core i7-7500U Core i7-7600U Core m3-7Y30 Pentium 4415U Pentium Gold 4415U Pentium Gold 4415Y
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Athlon X2 L310 Athlon X2 QL-60 Athlon X2 QL-62 Athlon X2 QL-64 Athlon X2 QL-65 Athlon X2 QL-66 Athlon X2 QL-67

Contents

m3-7Y30 m3-7Y30
Athlon X2 QL-60 Athlon X2 QL-60

Primary details

Comparing Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon X2 QL-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2077not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core m32x AMD Athlon
Power efficiency34.14no data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Lion (2008−2009)
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Detailed specifications

Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon X2 QL-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/s3600 MHz
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon X2 QL-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1515S1
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon X2 QL-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data

Security technologies

Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon X2 QL-60 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon X2 QL-60 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon X2 QL-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 615no data
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon X2 QL-60 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon X2 QL-60 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon X2 QL-60 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon X2 QL-60.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes10no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m3-7Y30 2585
+373%
Athlon X2 QL-60 547

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

m3-7Y30 4086
+221%
Athlon X2 QL-60 1273

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

m3-7Y30 8639
+208%
Athlon X2 QL-60 2803

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

m3-7Y30 3407
+152%
Athlon X2 QL-60 1352

Pros & cons summary

Recency 30 August 2016 3 June 2008
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 35 Watt

m3-7Y30 has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 775% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon X2 QL-60. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-7Y30 and Athlon X2 QL-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Core m3-7Y30
Core m3-7Y30
AMD Athlon X2 QL-60
Athlon X2 QL-60
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

m3-7Y30 Core m3 7Y30
vs
i3-7020U Core i3 7020U
Athlon X2 QL-60 Athlon X2 QL-60
vs
Athlon X2 QL-67 Athlon X2 QL-67
m3-7Y30 Core m3 7Y30
vs
FX-7600P FX 7600P
m3-7Y30 Core m3 7Y30
vs
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
m3-7Y30 Core m3 7Y30
vs
Phenom II X2 N640 Phenom II X2 N640
PRO A12-9800B PRO A12 9800B
vs
m3-7Y30 Core m3 7Y30
m3-7Y30 Core m3 7Y30
vs
A4 Micro-6400T A4 Micro 6400T
m3-7Y30 Core m3 7Y30
vs
A6-1450 A6 1450
m3-7Y30 Core m3 7Y30
vs
Turion 64 X2 TL-56 Turion 64 X2 TL-56
m3-7Y30 Core m3 7Y30
vs
Turion 64 X2 TL-52 Turion 64 X2 TL-52
m3-7Y30 Core m3 7Y30
vs
Turion 64 ML-44 Turion 64 ML-44
m3-7Y30 Core m3 7Y30
vs
V-Series V120 V Series V120
m3-7Y30 Core m3 7Y30
vs
V-Series V105 V Series V105

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 115 votes

Rate Core m3-7Y30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 34 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m3-7Y30 or Athlon X2 QL-60, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.