Atom D525 vs Core m3-6Y30
Primary details
Comparing Core m3-6Y30 and Atom D525 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2161 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core m3 | Intel Atom |
| Architecture codename | Skylake-Y | Pinetrail (2009−2010) |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 (8 years ago) | 21 June 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | $63 |
Detailed specifications
Core m3-6Y30 and Atom D525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 0.9 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 112 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 98.57 mm2 | 87 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1750 Million | 176 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core m3-6Y30 and Atom D525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1515 | 559 FCBGA8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-6Y30 and Atom D525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-6Y30 and Atom D525 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-6Y30 and Atom D525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2, DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 29.861 GB/s | 6.4 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 515 | Intel GMA 3150 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-6Y30 and Atom D525.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 10 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 65%
Core m3-6Y30 outperforms Atom D525 by 440% in Passmark.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core m3-6Y30 outperforms Atom D525 by 456% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Core m3-6Y30 outperforms Atom D525 by 319% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Core m3-6Y30 outperforms Atom D525 by 212% in 3DMark06 CPU.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Atom D525 outperforms Core m3-6Y30 by 129% in wPrime 32.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
Core m3-6Y30 outperforms Atom D525 by 300% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2015 | 21 June 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 18 Watt |
m3-6Y30 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 260% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core m3-6Y30 and Atom D525. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-6Y30 and Atom D525, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
