i5-9600KF vs i9-9990XE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9990XE
2018
14 cores / 28 threads, 255 Watt
18.99
+183%
Core i5-9600KF
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
6.72

Core i9-9990XE outperforms Core i5-9600KF by a whopping 183% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9990XE and Core i5-9600KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3111037
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.947.60
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i9Intel Core i5
Power efficiency7.056.69
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date19 October 2018 (6 years ago)8 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,800$262

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-9600KF has 159% better value for money than i9-9990XE.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9990XE and Core i5-9600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads286
Base clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier4037
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)9 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data149 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9990XE and Core i5-9600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket2066FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9990XE and Core i5-9600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+

Security technologies

Core i9-9990XE and Core i5-9600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9990XE and Core i5-9600KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9990XE and Core i5-9600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4-2666
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s41.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9990XE and Core i5-9600KF.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9990XE 18.99
+183%
i5-9600KF 6.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9990XE 30162
+183%
i5-9600KF 10675

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.99 6.72
Recency 19 October 2018 8 January 2019
Physical cores 14 6
Threads 28 6
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 95 Watt

i9-9990XE has a 182.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 133.3% more physical cores and 366.7% more threads.

i5-9600KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 168.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-9990XE is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-9600KF in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9990XE and Core i5-9600KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9990XE
Core i9-9990XE
Intel Core i5-9600KF
Core i5-9600KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 37 votes

Rate Core i9-9990XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1169 votes

Rate Core i5-9600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9990XE or Core i5-9600KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.