EPYC 7452 vs i9-9960X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9960X
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 165 Watt
19.05
EPYC 7452
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 155 Watt
28.33
+48.7%

EPYC 7452 outperforms Core i9-9960X by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9960X and EPYC 7452 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking303163
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.758.57
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9AMD EPYC
Power efficiency10.9317.30
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date19 October 2018 (6 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,684$2,025

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7452 has 80% better value for money than i9-9960X.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9960X and EPYC 7452 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3264
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.35 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3123.5
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache22 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size484 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9960X and EPYC 7452 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2066TR4
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9960X and EPYC 7452. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i9-9960X and EPYC 7452 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9960X and EPYC 7452 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9960X and EPYC 7452. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9960X and EPYC 7452.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes44no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9960X 19.05
EPYC 7452 28.33
+48.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9960X 30254
EPYC 7452 44996
+48.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-9960X 1385
+28.8%
EPYC 7452 1075

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-9960X 10376
+26.3%
EPYC 7452 8215

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.05 28.33
Recency 19 October 2018 7 August 2019
Physical cores 16 32
Threads 32 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 155 Watt

EPYC 7452 has a 48.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 6.5% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7452 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-9960X in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-9960X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7452 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9960X and EPYC 7452, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9960X
Core i9-9960X
AMD EPYC 7452
EPYC 7452

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 321 vote

Rate Core i9-9960X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 71 vote

Rate EPYC 7452 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9960X or EPYC 7452, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.