EPYC Embedded 8434P vs i9-9900X

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900X and EPYC Embedded 8434P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking534not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.90no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency7.89no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date19 October 2018 (6 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$989no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900X and EPYC Embedded 8434P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads2096
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data4x 73 mm2
Maximum core temperature92 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C75 °C
Number of transistorsno data35,500 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900X and EPYC Embedded 8434P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2066SP6
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900X and EPYC Embedded 8434P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i9-9900X and EPYC Embedded 8434P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900X and EPYC Embedded 8434P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900X and EPYC Embedded 8434P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900X and EPYC Embedded 8434P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4496

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2018 1 October 2024
Physical cores 10 48
Threads 20 96
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 200 Watt

i9-9900X has 21.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 8434P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 380% more physical cores and 380% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core i9-9900X and EPYC Embedded 8434P. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i9-9900X is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 8434P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900X and EPYC Embedded 8434P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900X
Core i9-9900X
AMD EPYC Embedded 8434P
EPYC Embedded 8434P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 101 vote

Rate Core i9-9900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 8434P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9900X or EPYC Embedded 8434P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.