Xeon W-3225 vs i9-9900KF
Aggregate performance score
Core i9-9900KF outperforms Xeon W-3225 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3225 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 688 | 698 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.44 | 12.24 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Intel Core i9 | Intel Xeon W |
| Power efficiency | 11.43 | 6.65 |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 7 January 2019 (5 years ago) | 3 June 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $488 | $1,199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon W-3225 has 45% better value for money than i9-9900KF.
Detailed specifications
Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3225 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 37 |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 16.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 68 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3225 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 160 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3225. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3225 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| MPX | + | - |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3225 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3225. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3225.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.47 | 11.25 |
| Recency | 7 January 2019 | 3 June 2019 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 160 Watt |
i9-9900KF has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, and 68.4% lower power consumption.
Xeon W-3225, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3225.
Note that Core i9-9900KF is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3225 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-3225, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
