Ultra 7 165U vs i9-9900K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9900K
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
11.49
+2.6%
Core Ultra 7 165U
2023
12 cores / 14 threads, 15 Watt
11.20

Core i9-9900K outperforms Core Ultra 7 165U by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900K and Core Ultra 7 165U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking685700
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.94no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore i9 (Desktop)Intel Meteor Lake-U
Power efficiency11.3970.29
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Meteor Lake-P (2023)
Release date19 October 2018 (6 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488$448

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900K and Core Ultra 7 165U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1614
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C110 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900K and Core Ultra 7 165U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketLGA-1151FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900K and Core Ultra 7 165U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Core i9-9900K and Core Ultra 7 165U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900K and Core Ultra 7 165U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900K and Core Ultra 7 165U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth44.668 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630Intel® Graphics
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz2 GHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-9900K and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-9900K and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hz3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-9900K and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.2
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900K and Core Ultra 7 165U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1612
PCI supportno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9900K 11.49
+2.6%
Ultra 7 165U 11.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9900K 18252
+2.6%
Ultra 7 165U 17783

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-9900K 1979
+21%
Ultra 7 165U 1636

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-9900K 212
Ultra 7 165U 240
+13.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-9900K 8845
+3.1%
Ultra 7 165U 8577

Blender(-)

i9-9900K 224
Ultra 7 165U 323
+44.1%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-9900K 1300
Ultra 7 165U 1734
+33.3%

7-Zip Single

i9-9900K 5411
+10.5%
Ultra 7 165U 4895

7-Zip

i9-9900K 48207
+19.6%
Ultra 7 165U 40306

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.49 11.20
Recency 19 October 2018 14 December 2023
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 14
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

i9-9900K has a 2.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 14.3% more threads.

Ultra 7 165U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 50% more physical cores, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i9-9900K and Core Ultra 7 165U.

Note that Core i9-9900K is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 165U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900K and Core Ultra 7 165U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900K
Core i9-9900K
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U
Core Ultra 7 165U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2409 votes

Rate Core i9-9900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 10 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 165U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9900K or Core Ultra 7 165U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.