Ryzen 5 3600XT vs i9-9820X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9820X
2018
10 cores / 20 threads, 165 Watt
12.77
+8.4%
Ryzen 5 3600XT
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
11.78

Core i9-9820X outperforms Ryzen 5 3600XT by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9820X and Ryzen 5 3600XT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking597657
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.7923.16
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i9AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency7.2911.69
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date8 October 2018 (6 years ago)16 June 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$898$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 3600XT has 384% better value for money than i9-9820X.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9820X and Ryzen 5 3600XT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2012
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache640 KB384 KB
L2 cache10 MB3 MB
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Maximum core temperature92 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9820X and Ryzen 5 3600XT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2066AM4
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9820X and Ryzen 5 3600XT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i9-9820X and Ryzen 5 3600XT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9820X and Ryzen 5 3600XT are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9820X and Ryzen 5 3600XT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/A-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9820X and Ryzen 5 3600XT.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes44no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9820X 12.77
+8.4%
Ryzen 5 3600XT 11.78

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9820X 20210
+8.4%
Ryzen 5 3600XT 18637

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.77 11.78
Recency 8 October 2018 16 June 2020
Physical cores 10 6
Threads 20 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 95 Watt

i9-9820X has a 8.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads.

Ryzen 5 3600XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 73.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i9-9820X and Ryzen 5 3600XT.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9820X and Ryzen 5 3600XT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9820X
Core i9-9820X
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
Ryzen 5 3600XT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 44 votes

Rate Core i9-9820X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 538 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9820X or Ryzen 5 3600XT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.