i7-11700F vs i9-9820X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9820X
2018
10 cores / 20 threads, 165 Watt
12.74
Core i7-11700F
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
13.21
+3.7%

Core i7-11700F outperforms Core i9-9820X by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9820X and Core i7-11700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking606572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.00no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i9no data
Power efficiency7.3119.23
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date8 October 2018 (6 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$898no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9820X and Core i7-11700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache640 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache10 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature92 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9820X and Core i7-11700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9820X and Core i7-11700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i9-9820X and Core i7-11700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9820X and Core i7-11700F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9820X and Core i7-11700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s50 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9820X and Core i7-11700F.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9820X 12.74
i7-11700F 13.21
+3.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9820X 20234
i7-11700F 20980
+3.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.74 13.21
Recency 8 October 2018 16 March 2021
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 20 16
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 65 Watt

i9-9820X has 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads.

i7-11700F, on the other hand, has a 3.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 153.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i9-9820X and Core i7-11700F.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9820X and Core i7-11700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9820X
Core i9-9820X
Intel Core i7-11700F
Core i7-11700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 44 votes

Rate Core i9-9820X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 984 votes

Rate Core i7-11700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9820X or Core i7-11700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.