Apple M1 Max vs i9-9800X

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9800X and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated525
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Architecture codenameSkylake-X (2018)no data
Release dateOctober 2018 (6 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9800X and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1610
Base clock speedno data2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.22 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)2.9 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)28 MB
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)48 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data57000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9800X and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket2066no data
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt2060 ‑ 3220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9800X and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core i9-9800X and Apple M1 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9800X and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9800X and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 Max 32-Core GPU

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 10
Threads 16 10
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 2060 Watt

i9-9800X has 60% more threads, and 1148.5% lower power consumption.

Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has 25% more physical cores, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core i9-9800X and Apple M1 Max. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i9-9800X is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9800X and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9800X
Core i9-9800X
Apple M1 Max
M1 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Core i9-9800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 683 votes

Rate Apple M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9800X or Apple M1 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.